| 202 | 0 | 161 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对传统真空预压排水板淤堵导致真空度传递效率降低，影响深部土体加固效果的问题，开发一种反向排水板真空预压软土地基加固方法，探究其深部土体加固效果。开展传统真空预压、反向排水板真空预压、正反向排水板真空预压室内物理模型试验，分析真空度、排水量、沉降量、加固后土体含水率、不排水剪切强度、固结度等指标的变化规律，证明反向排水板真空预压法对深部土体加固效果的有效性。结果表明，与传统真空预压相比，反向排水板和正反向排水板真空预压真空度提高6.5%和19.3%,排水量增大9.19%和19.7%,沉降量增加17.55%和20.61%,加固后土体含水率降低至30%～36%和21%～25%,不排水剪切强度提高1.33倍和2.21倍，最终平均固结度可达92.58%和99.03%。
Abstract：In response to the clogging of prefabricated vertical drain(PVD) for traditional vacuum preloading, which reduces the efficiency of vacuum degree transmission and affects the reinforcement effect of deep ground, a reverse PVD vacuum preloading method was developed to investigate its deep soil reinforcement effect. Laboratory physical model tests on traditional vacuum preloading, reverse PVD vacuum preloading, and forward and reverse PVD vacuum preloading was conducted. The changes in indicators were analyzed, such as vacuum degree, water discharge, settlement, water content after reinforcement, undrained shear strength after reinforcement, and consolidation degree, and proved the effectiveness of the reverse PVD vacuum preloading method in strengthening deep soil. The results show that compared with traditional vacuum preloading, the vacuum degree of reverse PVD and forward and reverse PVD vacuum preloading increase by 6.5% and 19.3%, the water discharge increases by 9.19% and 19.7%, and the settlement amount enlargee by 17.55% and 20.61%. After reinforcement, the water content decreases to 30%～36% and 21%～25%, and the undrained shear strength increases by 1.33 times and 2.21 times. The final average consolidation degree can reach 92.58% and 99.03%.
[1] INDRARATNA B,RUJIKIATKAMJORN C,BARAL P,et al.Performance of marine clay stabilised with vacuum pressure:based on Queensland experience[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2019,11:598-611.
[2] 蔡袁强.吹填淤泥真空预压固结机理与排水体防淤堵处理技术[J].岩土工程学报，2021,43(2):201-225.
[3] 胡利文，刘志军.真空预压加固土体变形机制分析[J].岩土力学，2021,42(3):790-799,812.
[4] ZHANG X D,HUANG T W,WU Y J.Soil drainage clogging mechanism under vacuum preloading:a review[J].Transportation Geotechnics,2023,45:101178.
[5] LU Y T,CHAI J C,DING W Q.Predicting deformation of PVD improved deposit under vacuum and surcharge loads[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2020,48:32-40.
[6] FENG S X,BAI W W,LEI H Y,et al.Vacuum preloading combined with surcharge preloading method for consolidation of clay-slurry ground:a case study[J].Marine Georesources & Geotechnology,2023,42(4):348-361.
[7] WU Y J,LIN Z X,KONG G Q,et al.Treatment of municipal sludge by Fenton oxidation combined vacuum preloading[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2018,25(16):15990-15997.
[8] 武亚军，陆逸天，牛坤，等.药剂真空预压法处理工程废浆试验[J].岩土工程学报，2016,38(8):1365-1373.
[9] LEI H Y,LOU J,LI X,et al.Stabilization effect of anionic polyacrylamide on marine clay treated with lime[J].International Journal of Geomechanics,2020,20(6):04020050.
[10] 沈宇鹏，余江，刘辉，等.增压式真空预压处理站场软基效果试验研究[J].铁道学报，2011,33(5):97-103.
[11] SHEN Y P,LIU Y,GENG S,et al.Consolidation theory of homogeneous multilayer treatment by air-boosted vacuum preloading[J].European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering,2022,26(12):5634-5652.
[12] WANG J,CAI Y Q,MA J J,et al.Improved vacuum preloading method for consolidation of dredged clay-slurry fill[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2016,142(11):06016012.
[13] CAI Y Q,XIE Z W,WANG J,et al.New approach of vacuum preloading with booster prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) to improve deep marine clay strata[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2018,55:1359-1371.
[14] FENG S X,LEI H Y,DING X D,et al.Shallow ground treatment by a combined air booster and straight-line vacuum preloading method:a case study[J].Geomechanics and Engineering,2021,24(2):129-141.
[15] FENG S X,LEI H Y,LIN C.Analysis of ground deformation development and settlement prediction by air-boosted vacuum preloading[J].Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2022,14:272-288.
[16] 中国土木工程学会.增压式真空预压加固软土地基技术规程：T/CCES 45—2024[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2024.
[17] 冯双喜，雷华阳，万勇峰，等.新型辐射排水板真空预压加固效果[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,52(3):790-805.
[18] LEI H Y,LI J K,FENG S X,et al.Reinforcement effect and mechanism analysis of dredged sludge treated by alternating prefabricated radiant drain vacuum preloading method[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2023,51:56-72.
[19] CHEN H,CHU J,GUO W,et al.Land reclamation using the horizontal drainage enhanced geotextile sheet method[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2023,51:131-150.
[20] LIU F Y,LI H,WANG J,et al.Experimental analysis of a staged vacuum preloading method with PHD-PVD for waste slurry treatment[J].Acta Geotechnica,2024,19:2487-2497.
[21] WANG J,FU H T,ZHANG W K,et al.Effect of pressurization frequency and duration on the consolidation of a dredged soil using air booster vacuum preloading combined with prefabricated horizontal drains[J].Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2023,51:209-218.
[22] 林志强.真空预压排水板有效真空压力变化规律[J].水运工程，2015(7):161-166.
[23] 武亚军，陈浩，VU Quoc Vuong,等.正反向排水板真空预压法在地基处理工程中的应用[J].水运工程，2024(7):217-225,238.
[24] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土工试验方法标准：GB/T 50123—2019[S].北京：中国计划出版社，2019.
[25] 雷华阳，方庆峰，刘景锦，等.注气加载路径对增压式真空预压法加固吹填软土的效果分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报，2023,42(8):2058-2067.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13624/j.cnki.issn.1001-7445.2025.0938
中图分类号:TU472.33
引用信息:
[1]雷华阳,冯双喜,王雅申,等.反向排水板真空预压法处理软土地基加固效果[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2025,50(05):938-949.DOI:10.13624/j.cnki.issn.1001-7445.2025.0938.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(52108336); 天津市自然科学基金项目(22JCQNJC00130); 天津大学大学生创新训练项目(2024-B-3)
2025-10-25
2025-10-25